The Bronze Medalist’s Secret
The Faces on the Podium
In 1995, a team of psychologists at Cornell University published a study that has since become famous. They gathered footage from the 1992 Barcelona Olympics — the moments athletes learned their results, and the medal ceremonies afterward — and showed the clips, without scores or context, to viewers who were asked to rate the athletes’ expressions on a simple happiness scale.
The results were startling. The bronze medalists were visibly happier than the silver medalists. Not slightly happier — noticeably, measurably happier. Athletes who finished third beamed on the podium, while many who finished second — objectively more successful — stood there with faces of barely concealed disappointment.
The researchers called the phenomenon “counterfactual thinking.” The silver medalist compares upward: I almost won the gold. Inches away. The bronze medalist compares downward: I almost went home with nothing. Same podium, same games — but two opposite inner worlds. Because happiness, it turns out, is not determined by what you have. It’s determined by what you compare it to. We instinctively assume happiness follows achievement. The podium says otherwise.
We all live on that podium. It happens with every portion in life — the house, the job, the children, the bank account. But nowhere does it cut deeper than in marriage, where it may be the most common quiet ache of all — comparing. She’s wonderful, but she’s not organized like his sister-in-law. He’s devoted, but he’s not the earner her friend married. Nothing is said aloud, usually. It’s just a silver medalist’s face, on the inside.
Chazal knew about this face. And they dedicated a yom tov to curing it.
Dancing in the Vineyards
The Mishnah makes an astonishing statement about Tu B’Av, the fifteenth of Av: “There were no yamim tovim for Yisrael like the fifteenth of Av and Yom Kippur” (Taanis 26b). No days greater — not Pesach, not Succos, not Shavuos. Why?
The Gemara (Taanis 30b–31a) lists six historical events that occurred on that date: the generation of the Midbar stopped dying, the tribes were permitted to marry each other, shevet Binyamin was readmitted into Klal Yisrael, the slain of Beitar were finally brought to burial — and more. Six different events, one common thread. Each is a story of reconciliation and restoration after tragedy.
And how was such a day celebrated? The Mishnah describes it: “The daughters of Yerushalayim would go out in borrowed white garments, so as not to embarrass one who did not have… and dance in the vineyards. And what would they say? ‘Young man, lift up your eyes and see what you choose for yourself.’”
The Gemara records what the girls would say. The beautiful ones would say: “Set your eyes on beauty, for a wife is for beauty.” The girls from distinguished families would say: “Set your eyes on family, for a wife is for children.” And the plain ones would say: “Make your acquisition l’shem Shamayim — as long as you adorn us with golden jewelry.”
To our ears the whole scene is jarring. Each group of girls openly promoting her own category? In our culture, the entire arrangement would be unthinkable.
Like Choosing an Esrog
Rav Avigdor Miller explains that the scene has to be understood in its context. These were very young, very pure boys and girls — a generation raised in kedushah we can barely imagine. There was no vanity in it and no cynicism. It was, Rav Miller says, like choosing an esrog: walking among kosher, beautiful options and weighing ma’alos openly, honestly, for the sake of a mitzvah.
A good detail. But listen again to what the girls are actually saying, and you’ll hear something more. Each group is not only describing herself — she is handing the young man instructions for the next fifty years. Did you choose beauty? Then “a wife is for beauty” is your portion; delight in it. Did you choose yichus? Then “a wife is for children” means you have attached yourself to generations of greatness; build on it. Did you choose l’shem Shamayim? You have chosen the greatest ma’alah of all — treat it like the treasure it is. (And, the plain girls add with disarming honesty, “Don’t imagine that exempts you from the jewelry.”)
No man gets the entire list. That is the point of the vineyard — every category danced there, but each young man went home with one. The girls, in their innocence, were teaching the deepest rule of married happiness — it will not necessarily depend on which ma’alah you brought home. It will depend on whether you keep your eyes on it — or on the ones you didn’t.
Matza or Motzei
The Gemara in Berachos (8a) relates that in Eretz Yisrael, when a man married, they would ask him a one-word question: matza or motzei? Matza, as in the passuk “Matza ishah matza tov — One who has found a wife has found goodness” (Mishlei 18:22). Or motzei, as in “U’motzei ani mar mimaves es ha’ishah — And I find more bitter than death the woman” (Koheles 7:26).
Rav Miller points out the strange grammar of the question. Matza is past tense: I found. The search is over; the results are in; I found goodness. Motzei is present tense: I am finding — still searching, still weighing, still comparing, still walking through the vineyard years after the chasunah. The bitterness in Koheles is not a bitter woman, chas v’shalom. It’s a bitter tense. The man who lives in the present tense — whose eyes are still scanning what he didn’t get — has turned himself into the silver medalist, and no wife on earth can cure that, because the problem was never her.
That, Rav Miller teaches, is precisely the yetzer hara’s strategy: to make a person unhappy not with what he has, but with what he imagines he was denied.
And it can hardly be coincidence that this same week we read, in Parshas Va’eschanan, the Aseres Hadibros — which conclude with lo sachmod, and in Moshe Rabbeinu’s retelling, a striking addition: “v’lo sisaveh — and do not desire” (Devarim 5:18). Consider that. The Aseres Hadibros do not end with murder or theft. They end with the invisible crime — the one committed entirely inside the mind: imagining that another life, another lot, another spouse would have made us happier. The Torah closes its ten foundations by legislating against the podium face.
A Bundle of Straw
If we need a picture of what the alternative looks like, Chazal gave us one. Rachel, the daughter of Kalba Savua — one of the wealthiest men in Yerushalayim — saw a single ma’alah in a forty-year-old unlearned shepherd who worked for her father, and she staked everything on it. For that one quality she gave up the wealth, the comforts and the standing of her father’s house; when they married, her father disowned her completely.
The Gemara (Nedarim 50a) tells it in its own words: “In the winter they would sleep in a straw storehouse, and he would pick the straw out of her hair. He said to her: ‘If I had the means, I would give you a Yerushalayim shel zahav’” — a golden ornament engraved with the image of the holy city.
Just then, a voice at the door. A poor man stood there: “My wife has given birth, and I have nothing to lay her on. Can you spare a little straw?” They gave him from their straw, and Rabbi Akiva turned to Rachel: “You see? There is someone who doesn’t even have straw.”
Chazal reveal that the poor man was Eliyahu Hanavi. Think about what that means. At the lowest material moment of the greatest marriage in our history, Heaven itself stepped in to manage the comparison. The couple was not shown who had more. They were shown who had less — and it was enough.
Twenty-four years later, Rabbi Akiva returned home as the leader of the generation, with twenty-four thousand talmidim — and he bought her the Yerushalayim shel zahav.
The Full Moon
Tu B’Av arrives just six days after Tisha B’Av, when the moon of the bitterest month stands full — the same full moon that told the generation of the Midbar that the dying was finally over — and it falls, this year as always, in the week of Nachamu. Perhaps that is the deepest connection of all. Nechamah itself is a change of tense: the ability to look at the same life, the same spouse, the same portion, and say matza — found — instead of endlessly finding. Tu B’Av invites us to choose our portion all over again — and this time, to choose it in the past tense. The bronze medalist’s secret turns out to be the oldest teaching in the vineyard. Happiness was never about the medal. It’s about where you point your eyes.
Visit www.YaakovAstor.com
Get new articles by email.
Leave a Reply